Disclaimers
Affiliate Disclaimer:This site contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only promote products we believe will add value to our readers.
For more information, please see our Affiliate Disclaimer Page.
Financial Disclaimer:Investing and trading in stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments carries inherent risks. The content on this blog is not intended to serve as financial or investment advice. Please consult with a certified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any information provided. Any reliance you place on the content of this blog is strictly at your own risk.
Please see our Disclaimer Page.
This content is free thanks to our sponsors
Sponsored Ad – I may earn a commission if you click and buy
Table of Contents
Most new investors do the wrong thing at exactly the wrong moment. Here's what the data actually says about bull and bear markets — and why understanding the difference could be the most important thing you learn this year.
At some point in your investing life, you will watch your portfolio drop. Not by a little — by a lot. Maybe 20%. Maybe 40%. You'll open your brokerage app on a Tuesday morning, see a sea of red, and feel a very specific, very powerful urge: get out before it gets worse.
That urge is one of the most expensive instincts in personal finance. And it's triggered by something most beginners were never properly taught — the difference between a bull market and a bear market, and crucially, what history says about how long each one actually lasts.
Understanding these two market states won't tell you when the next crash is coming. Nobody knows that. But it will tell you something far more useful: what has reliably happened to investors who panicked and sold versus those who understood what kind of market they were in and acted accordingly.
The Numbers That Change How You Think About This
Let's start with the definitions, because most people have them slightly wrong. A bull market is a sustained rise in stock prices — conventionally defined as a gain of 20% or more from a recent low. A bear market is the opposite: a drop of 20% or more from a recent high. That 20% threshold isn't a law of nature, but it's the widely accepted line that separates normal volatility from something more significant.
Now here's the data that matters. According to Bespoke Investment Group, the average S&P 500 bull market since 1929 has lasted 1,011 days — roughly two and three-quarter years. The average bear market over the same period lasted around 286 days. Bull markets don't just outlast bear markets — they dwarf them in terms of duration.
The gains tell an even starker story. First Trust Advisors, using Morningstar data from 1926 through 2018, found that the average bull market produced a cumulative return of 480%. The average bear market produced a cumulative loss of 41%. Over the past century, the S&P 500 has experienced 21 bull markets and 20 bear markets. Every single bear market in that history has eventually been followed by a new bull market. Every one.
"An investor who sold at a market trough over the past century would have missed a 150% gain from the average following bull market." — Sensible Financial Planning, citing S&P 500 historical data
And the long-term picture is almost difficult to comprehend in its scale. According to Sensible Financial Planning's analysis, $100 invested in the S&P 500 in January 1926, with dividends reinvested, would have grown to approximately $1.48 million by 2024 — a compounded annual growth rate of 10.3%. That return didn't come in a straight line. It came through 20 significant market downturns, two world wars, multiple recessions, and dozens of events that felt, in the moment, like the end of the world as investors knew it.
The contrarian insight buried in all of this: bear markets are not the enemy of long-term investors. Panic during bear markets is.
Why Intelligent People Do the Wrong Thing Anyway
It's March 2020. The S&P 500 has just dropped 34% in 33 days — the fastest bear market decline in history. Every news channel is running the same story: unprecedented, unknown, potentially catastrophic. Your portfolio is down a third. You don't know how much further it will fall.
For millions of investors, that was the moment they sold. And it was, in hindsight, one of the worst financial decisions they could have made. The market recovered its entire loss within five months. By the end of 2020, the S&P 500 finished the year up 16%. The investors who sold in March locked in permanent losses. The investors who held — or bought more — captured one of the sharpest recoveries in market history.
This pattern repeats with remarkable consistency. From 2007 to 2009, the S&P 500 lost over 56%. The recovery took until 2013 — six years to claw back to even, and that assumes investors stayed fully invested the entire time. Most didn't. They panicked, moved to cash, and missed the recovery. Bank of America research found that the market's best single days — the days that account for a disproportionate share of long-term returns — typically follow immediately after the largest drops. An investor who misses just the ten best trading days in any given decade can cut their overall returns roughly in half.
This isn't a character flaw. It's wiring. Behavioural economics calls it loss aversion: humans feel the pain of a loss approximately twice as intensely as they feel the pleasure of an equivalent gain. When your portfolio is falling, every instinct in your brain is screaming that action is required. The hard truth is that for most long-term investors, the correct action in a bear market is often no action at all.
Understanding what kind of market you're in — and what history says about how it ends — is what makes that inaction feel like a decision rather than paralysis.
Bull vs Bear — What's Actually Happening in Each
Click any card below to see the full breakdown.
Three Hypothetical Investors — What the Data Predicts
Disclaimer: The following examples are entirely hypothetical and created for illustration only. "James," "Amara," and "David" are fictional characters. These are not real accounts or guaranteed outcomes. All investing involves significant risk of loss. Past market performance does not guarantee future results.
James, 34 — First-Time Investor Who Bought at the Peak
Starting point: James puts $10,000 into a broad S&P 500 index fund at what turns out to be a market peak. Three months later, the market has dropped 30% and his account shows $7,000. He has never experienced this before. He checks the balance every day. The news is uniformly terrible.
Month four (the decision): James sells. He moves everything to cash. His reasoning feels sound: he'll get back in once things stabilise, once there's some clarity, once the news gets better. He has locked in a $3,000 loss.
The problem: The market bottoms out two weeks after he sells and begins recovering. He watches from the sidelines. The news doesn't get noticeably better for months — but the market climbs anyway, because markets price in the future, not the present. By the time James feels confident enough to reinvest, the index is already 25% above where he sold. He gets back in — but he's chasing a recovery he already missed.
The key insight: James didn't lose money because of the bear market. He lost money because he sold during it. The bear market was temporary. His locked-in loss was permanent. This is the most common and most costly mistake in retail investing, and it is driven almost entirely by not understanding that bear markets end.
Amara, 29 — Investor Who Understood the History
Starting point: Same scenario. $10,000 invested, market drops 30%, account shows $7,000. Amara has read about historical bear markets. She knows the average bear lasts around 286 days. She knows every bear in the last century has been followed by a bull. She doesn't feel calm — but she feels informed.
What she does: Nothing. She stops checking the balance daily. She keeps her automatic monthly contributions running. At the bottom, she is effectively buying additional units at a 30% discount to what she paid originally.
Eighteen months later: The market has fully recovered and pushed to new highs. Amara's account is worth more than her original $10,000 — and her continued contributions during the downturn bought shares at prices she'll never see again.
The key insight: Amara didn't win because she timed anything correctly. She won because she didn't do the wrong thing. The historical data did her thinking for her.
David, 52 — Investor Who Is Closer to Retirement
Starting point: $180,000 invested across stocks and bonds. A bear market hits and his stock allocation drops significantly. David is 12 years from retirement. He can't afford to take the same approach as a 29-year-old.
The nuance: David's situation is genuinely different, and the standard "just hold" advice applies less cleanly here. UBS research notes that the main risk during a bear market for investors with shorter time horizons isn't just the market itself — it's being forced to sell at depressed prices because you need the money. David's correct response isn't panic selling, but it is legitimate portfolio review: ensuring his allocation between stocks and bonds matches his actual time horizon, not the allocation he set up when he was 40.
The key insight: Bear market strategy is not one-size-fits-all. The right response depends heavily on your time horizon. For long-term investors, history overwhelmingly favours staying invested. For those approaching or in retirement, the lesson is different: build your allocation before the bear market arrives, not during it, so you're never forced into a decision driven by necessity rather than strategy.
The Math That Makes Bear Markets Less Scary — and More Scary Simultaneously
Here's the piece most people don't think about. Percentage losses and percentage gains are not symmetrical. If your portfolio drops 20%, you don't need a 20% gain to get back to even — you need a 25% gain. Drop 30%, you need a 43% gain. Drop 50%, you need a 100% gain just to break even. This asymmetry is why bear markets are genuinely dangerous and why the depth of the decline matters so much.
Loss vs. Gain Required to Break Even
Illustrative representation of loss/recovery asymmetry. Mathematical, not based on any specific market period.
This is why the decision to sell during a bear market is so costly. You don't just lock in the loss — you also remove yourself from the recovery that history says is coming. And because bear market recoveries tend to be front-loaded (Charles Schwab research confirms that much of the rebound happens in the earliest days of recovery), the investors who wait for "clear skies" before getting back in consistently underperform those who stayed the course.
The other side of this math is why long-term investing works so powerfully. The S&P 500 has produced negative 10-year returns just 6% of the time since 1929, according to Bank of America data. Over any 20-year period in recorded U.S. market history, it has never produced a negative return. The market punishes short-term panic and rewards long-term patience with remarkable consistency.
One Important Caveat
Everything above applies to broadly diversified, long-term investing — primarily index funds covering the whole market. Individual stocks do not share these recovery guarantees. A company can enter a bear market of its own and never come back. Enron, Lehman Brothers, and countless others went to zero and stayed there. The historical resilience of markets refers to the market as a whole, not to any individual holding within it. This is one of the strongest arguments for diversification — it's what allows you to hold through a bear market with confidence, because you're not betting on any single company's survival.
What You Do With This
Bear markets are not unusual. The S&P 500 has experienced 27 bear markets since 1928, according to Keen Wealth Advisors — one roughly every 3.5 years on average. You will live through multiple bear markets as an investor. That is not a risk. It is a certainty. The only question is how you will respond when you're in one.
The investors who build wealth over time are not the ones who successfully predict market tops and bottoms. Research consistently shows that almost nobody does that reliably, including professionals. The investors who build wealth are the ones who understand the historical pattern — that bear markets are finite, that bull markets follow them, that the long-term direction of a broadly diversified portfolio has always been upward — and use that understanding to override the instinct to run.
You haven't been given a prediction. You've been given context. And context, in a bear market, is worth more than any forecast.
The next time the market drops 20% and your phone is full of notifications about financial catastrophe — will you remember what the last 100 years of market history actually shows?